The Daniel ๐
· 28w
Iโm not a protocol developer, so this is probably a better question for someone like nostr:nprofile1qyv8wumn8ghj76twvfhhstnjv4kxz7tn9ekxzmny9uq35amnwvaz7tms09exzmtfvshxv6tpw34xze3wvdhk6tcqyqalp33lewf5vdq847t6te0wvnags0gs0mu72kz8938tn24wlfze6luf5tq or nostr:nprofile1qqsvrlrhw86l5sv06wkyjgs6rrcekskv...
RooSoft
· 28w
Only sending updates would require the server to be able to sign the list on your behalf.
The whole point of nostr is to transfer control from server to the user.
fiatjaf
· 27w
It just happened without it being seriously planned for, and now we can't change it (despite many attempts from different people) because changing would break too many things.
It's not that bad, though. Well, actually the contact list event shouldn't have to be necessarily mapped to a list of peopl...
nostrich
· 27w
Fetching all users followed by you would be a mess, just like, currently, fetching the list of people that follow you is a mess (and clients may get it wrong, by listing people that used to follow you but no longer do).
Remember that relays have different data and no relay has all data. So if you f...