Oh of course, it definitely requires second-order analysis, but concluding that *obviously* means the market will prefer a no-burn fork I think is equally reductionist. Obviously seizing 1% of coins in a cartel isn’t the same as preventing a quantum computer from stealing N% of coins and enabling recovery paths for the coins where that’s possible. I see why you think it’s still over some philosophical line but you can’t say that it’s equivalent to some other scenario that we’ve ever faced.