Damus
Open in Damus
Hypno Kitty · 71w
Hmm. You leave out an important part of the timeline: Todd’s October 10 post occurred 90 minutes after Satoshi’s post — the one that the HBO doc claims Todd was trying to amplify as Satoshi, j...
 Perlover profile picture
Perlover @Perlover
I didn’t overlook the fact that he replied 90 minutes after Satoshi’s message. But take a closer look. First, the styles are not similar. Satoshi typically responded with long, detailed posts, whereas Peter’s reply was short, as if he just wanted to add his own thoughts after reading the message. Additionally, as I mentioned in that article, if Peter Todd were really Satoshi Nakamoto, it would have been incredibly foolish to mention, a year and a half later, that there were several posts in his name.
4
Perlover · 71w
The second fact is that, as soon as Peter Todd created his account on Bitcoin Talk, he posted a message within less than a minute, saying he wanted to buy an invitation to the social network Diaspora. This shows that his primary reason for creating the account was clearly to get an invitation, not t...
Hypno Kitty · 71w
Yes, I agree that the fact Peter Todd later referenced his December 2010 post and, even more to the point, that he didn’t delete that post, is exculpatory. As to the fact that he created the Peter Todd account to get an invitation — I think this is the documentary’s argument as well. That is...