It’s an interesting proposal. Right now, as nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsz9mhwden5te0we5hgmmj9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hsr097r2 pointed ...
Thanks for your feedback David,
Yes you are making very valid points, for me the important part is not that this becomes "the only one system" (although I said "Universal" perhaps I should change that) , the important part is that it has the potential to become fully decentralized.
Probably in a fully developed decentralized web of trust environments there would be many of these systems to cover different verticals, and ideally they would all be fully decentralized and not dependent on any DNS or private companies.
Yes you are making very valid points, for me the important part is not that this becomes "the only one system" (although I said "Universal" perhaps I should change that) , the important part is that it has the potential to become fully decentralized.
Probably in a fully developed decentralized web of trust environments there would be many of these systems to cover different verticals, and ideally they would all be fully decentralized and not dependent on any DNS or private companies.
2