adam back refs peter todd took <30' to inscript bip110 text on this tx bypassing bip110 rules 8e2ee13d2a19951c2777bb3a54f0cb69a2f76dae8baa954cd86149ed1138cb6c it's just a dust-party-chunk-spam-opreturn-tx where he burned vanity kilo sats 😎 just to trigger core wow 😮 😂🤣

The fact that nostr:nprofile1qqsve2jcud7fnjzmchn4gq52wx9agey9uhfukv69dy0v4wpuw4w53nqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgmwaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjm3wwdhkx6tpdshs5ayrsy was able to embed the BIP-110 PDF inside a BIP-110 compliant transaction is sufficient proof that it doesn't...

Instead of creating a BIP that filters transactions and splits the community, why not build a system that only uses OP_RETURN and ignores the rest of the optional content spaces within transactions entirely?

can you please post the counter points as well?

nostr:nevent1qqs0s8a34rfercwl0krx5xg3j3422gnnr7hksdefl48zyhqzaku5x4sppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tc0ezx03