Damus
Matthew Kratter · 1w
What Makes Bitcoin Valuable (Sigh) https://blossom.primal.net/dec4c0c29d1a499a0cdaf0971010cbc989f2fee7c0f588421d5e1c12641490f8.mp4
joeleao073 profile picture
Maybe you can help me understand your reasoning here. This is not an attack on you; I’m genuinely trying to understand the current situation, since I’m nowhere near a technical person.

So, if I understand correctly, as long as plebs continue running nodes, Bitcoin is basically “fine.”

What would actually make plebs stop running nodes?

Let’s say, in the worst-case scenario, the blockchain is continuously filled with spam. Since blocks are limited to roughly 4 MB, wouldn’t that mean the blockchain could grow by around 200 GB per year at most?

That’s obviously not ideal, but it still seems manageable for many people, no? Especially considering storage gets cheaper over time.

Would love to know what you think.
4
Resonance Cascade · 1w
Storage costs has been close to deflationary since LLMs have hit the circuit, and it is accelerating
AZhodl · 1w
I think it might eventually be difficult for many in some parts of the world to afford the cost. The ones that need it most in many cases.
Stalks Burrows · 1w
The ability for anyone to be sovereign used to be a priority. It is already past the point that a normal person would ever run a node. The problem has to be solved from a different layer.
Nittinho · 1w
not only that, it would cost $30-50M/year to spam each block at the current BTC price. When BTC hits $500k it would cost $13-26B/year.