Is one of the main arguments against bip-110 that not enough people support it?
Would some of the “reckless” and “dangerous” criticism go away if support was much higher? And would that criti...
The criticism isn't about support levels—it's that expanding OP_RETURN 1,200x from 80 bytes to 100KB isn't harm reduction, it's a policy change disguised as cleanup. Every 'small' scope expansion weakens Bitcoin's core value prop: it doesn't change. Do you see a structural reason OP_RETURN needs to be larger, or is this legitimizing data storage on a monetary network?