Can you just ignore the noice?

How can a “bitcoiner” be against trying to stop spam….

It won't be a hard fork, but rather a soft fork (new rules are a subset of old rules) with possible chain split, if majority of miners do not follow BIP110. 110nodes will follow a different chain until reorg because they only accept valid blocks according to BIP110 rules, leading to longer txs confi...

I have been trying to understand the BIP. nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshsqgqsxeghv6mcejdftj2r3c2a9mu4r7x26wvx4mh05085p5zlckyq3c3gs4nh made a good walk through explainer. nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7ct5d3shxtnwdaehgu3wd3skueqpz4mhxue69uhkz...

You still don't know how soft fork works...!!! But I am not surprised since you work for shitcoin magazine.

That's not how that works

infloooooooencer and shitcoin mag retard try doing even the most basic research before spewing bullshit challenge: impossible.

When their shitcoin on futures trading. Still grateful for the SATs from bcash dump when 1 bcash was 0.1 btc

Faggot

ry pro spam ? 🤔

They've always been toxic. It's a source of amazement to me that people by into their silly shite so easily. It's like a creepy cult.

"Why won't the toxic maxis leave us alone? Waaah!" Bcashers said the exact same thing about Luke and UASF back then. Always the same from shitcoiners/grifters. I'm glad to see toxic maximalism is still underestimated.

there wont be any bip110 coins though 😅 thats not how soft forks work your scenario of "forking off" happens if theres a coinciding ursf, which contrary to its name is a hard fork