Damus
BitBurn · 17w
https://nostrudel.ninja/n/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqfx8sxfhe2h4mu0x5fypldtdz6dtf8zq70344cjjrrzna9tjgz7eqyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9uqzq3dl6aadmj5t6tlxhzfd48xfxyr...
djinoz and √-1 others  profile picture
A couple or us were having a conversation about this the other day.
I've been in social since 2008 don't visit Twitter much since covid-v2 - so I don't play too much with "nostr the social" for the reasons you mentioned.

The thread was along the lines that: if nostr can't monetize beyond sat circles jerk then people won't fund relays. So nostr _could_ be great infrastructure for an Application first internet where identity and your reputation is portable between a "nostr airbnb" and a "nostr user" etc. So really using the vibe potential to attack VC funded b2b SaaS hegemony. It's e/acc without the Andreessens.

Nostr is a protocol so nobody needs permission to build whatever they like.

This is already hapoening and what @Alex Gleason is doing is true leadership. The problem I see now and getting really bad is the lack of curation of hobby projects that are basically broken. Like most OSS its "try 5 before you find the 1 that works". This is where VC funded businesses win. Relentless focus on g2m and onboarding and quality. Nostr needs more QA than developers, Nostr needs a benevolent VP of Product (jk but also serious)

</rant>

I guess the tl;dr might be "nostr the protocol" could be much bigger than the social.