Proposal: have a setting for “prefers discourse”. When an author enables this setting, they will not see reactions, AND readers will see some visual indicator that the author would much prefer actual content posts than a simple reaction or zap. This honors both the author’s and the reader’s...

nostr:note1gapcl7lf7xh3hw9eg4hny43vjg6hvtzqhrprver5wmeldvwqj44qwu8k49

🫂

实际上，我们让任何行为中带有闪电聪矢量值，就像人脑神经系统在计算自己时，会获得多巴胺和内啡肽神经递质奖励一样， 尽管来自神经递质的奖励是微不足道的，却对整个自组织计算系统非常重要。 评论、转发或zap的10 Sa...

I think a lot of people who are social media users don’t analyse about dopamine hits and stuff-they just use it and want an easy and straightforward experience-whether it is to get the news or a dopamine thing (which they may not know) The only zap option is different and new people may feel exclu...

For the uninitiated, who pays for the bits and atoms and joules sustaining this social network?

Replacing one ‘mindless dopamine trap’ with another one, one with monetary value attached. This whole thing feels more like a repackaged shuffle, of the same thing. Kind of like adding money to a game, you’re just moving the reward (dis)incentives. Dopamine will just hit differently. I’m n...

Yes!! Other platforms turn us into dopamine addicts and treat us like ‘users’. Sick of being used in this way.