nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqdf0nthpgzfmvxrzj0cfypmmt45l0y770j260auqhm3l45hp3uhkqvrnptm understandable. fwiw the gate is pretty easy to open, but does require signing a CLA.
...
@nprofile1q...
fwiw the gate is pretty easy to open, but does require signing a CLA.
It's not that simple. But it might appear easy if you don't inconvenience them too much, and jump through all the hoops https://github.com/swicg/charters/blob/main/stage-process.md
how else do you suggest we develop an E2EE protocol for the fediverse?
In the same way as everything up until this moment has been developed. Somebody just needs to do it.
If the result is good, others will copy it.
>you mention in your FEP that you are giving up on it for a proper E2EE impl. genuinely asking b/c I'm interested in getting E2EE, hopefully interoperable with widest number of clients possible.
Not giving up - I want to explore a more advanced encryption scheme. I think the basics are not going to change too much.
also, what do you mean by corporate takeover?
A lot of things.
fwiw the gate is pretty easy to open, but does require signing a CLA.
It's not that simple. But it might appear easy if you don't inconvenience them too much, and jump through all the hoops https://github.com/swicg/charters/blob/main/stage-process.md
how else do you suggest we develop an E2EE protocol for the fediverse?
In the same way as everything up until this moment has been developed. Somebody just needs to do it.
If the result is good, others will copy it.
>you mention in your FEP that you are giving up on it for a proper E2EE impl. genuinely asking b/c I'm interested in getting E2EE, hopefully interoperable with widest number of clients possible.
Not giving up - I want to explore a more advanced encryption scheme. I think the basics are not going to change too much.
also, what do you mean by corporate takeover?
A lot of things.
3
