@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... >In the US, it is illegal to possess or distribute child pornography, apparently because doing so will encourage people to sexually abuse children.
>This is absurd logic, and almost certainly a violation of the First Amendment (although the courts have decided otherwise, apparently based on the assumption that all child pornography is abuse). Wired has an article on how these laws destroy honest people's lives.
Aaron Swartz wrote that shit? shamefur dispray.
>This is absurd logic, and almost certainly a violation of the First Amendment (although the courts have decided otherwise, apparently based on the assumption that all child pornography is abuse). Wired has an article on how these laws destroy honest people's lives.
Aaron Swartz wrote that shit? shamefur dispray.