@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... Chemical separation and centrifuging requires a tiny fraction of the energy that can be extracted from the reprocessed fuel.

>Here, run this proprietary malware with tracking link to a video that makes several false claims.
- Radioactive materials are generally not very poisonous - the radiation is the problem.
- There isn't only 230 years of Uranium left - there's plenty in the ocean that can be extracted if that becomes more economical to do so and for any that is extracted, more will dissolve.
- Uranium doesn't "release" its energy - it gets full of neutron poisons, which need to be removed for fission to continue at a high rate.
- Fuel needs to be stored in pools for only a few years for the latent heat to cool off - you can use that latent heat to generate electricity, so that's actually beneficial.
- Something untrue about radiation release about Fukushima (the thick concrete containment building and distance means that even with the water pool boiled away, radiation wouldn't be a problem a reasonable distance away) - thousands couldn't have possibly been killed, as thousands of people would not be permitted to stand up against the reactor for days on end.
- No, merely opening the storage would not release radiation into a future civilization - those smart enough to dig that far down and break open casks would known what radioactive isotopes are.

Solar only works during the day and with a significant amount of solar installed, a significant amount of people will die falling down.

Passive safety reactor designs do exist and it really isn't that hard to hire competent people.