It's only a matter of time before a nutjob Knotzi puts child porn into the blockchain as a last ditch desperate measure to coerce folks into their poorly designed fork.
We'll know it's a Knotzi becau...
I agree, if that kind of image were to be put on the blockchain it probably would incentivize people toward knots/ BIP110. But why would they do that if the whole point of knots/BIP110 is to avoid images/non-monetary data storage. The image would be stored forever on both blockchains even if there were a fork, so what would they gain by doing that? Are you saying they would upload 1 CSAM image to get support for BIP-110 which would stop more potential CSAM images from getting put on the blockchain? Is that how you're framing the incentive? Help me understand what you're saying here.
1