Because BIP110 chain split provided the ultimate evidence that the core chain decision making is centralised. Bitcoiners are not interested in yet another system with 3rd party and after what happened...
With all due respect, the analysis that this “proves” all of these things is quite a strong claim.
It is, at least, equally as possible that BIP-110 was simply not a good enough of an idea for most of the network to want to adopt it.
Just because BIP-110 didn’t pass, doesn’t mean that somehow that Bitcoin is too centralized. It could also just be a humility test that a better idea is needed.
There are so many better ideas to solve these issues than BIP-110. Such as removing the witness discount.
It is, at least, equally as possible that BIP-110 was simply not a good enough of an idea for most of the network to want to adopt it.
Just because BIP-110 didn’t pass, doesn’t mean that somehow that Bitcoin is too centralized. It could also just be a humility test that a better idea is needed.
There are so many better ideas to solve these issues than BIP-110. Such as removing the witness discount.
