1. Is it really “reactive” security if you have to be proactive and secure both the vaulting backup and the fallback backup? 2. Seems like miniscript could get similar benefits with no soft fork and more flexibility, yeah? (Might have phrased some of that incorrectly)

Is it possible to do any kind of vaulting with some clever taproot script path spends? If so, what are the fundamental differences of that vs vaulting with OP_VAULT and what improvements does it provide?

OP_VAULT IS a terrible idea https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/11so39n/op_vault_is_a_proposed_upgrade_to_bitcoin_you_can/

Some thoughts 1. bip345 introduced a new utxo which is new, unprecedented, and not in a minor scope. Change is Too big. 2. bip345 seeks fast activation, and inevitable activation, but after only one month, it seems that the author has made significant changes to it, including detail implementati...