It’s confirmed that the new Jade Plus doesn’t have a secure element protecting the private key.
@Satoshi Consult🔑 always expected the next signing device from
@npub1jg552... to have at least one secure element, and not only a virtual secure element.
That’s really surprising for a signing device where the price starts at $149.
Why does
@npub1jg552... still prioritize a blind oracle over a secure element for protecting the private key?