Correct. But that doesn't mean it's private at all. An attacker still sees everything in and out via zaps, which is how most people use it.
Our defaults have never ever been private.
Yes, but even if I use a dedicated wallet for on-chain zaps, I still need to fund that wallet somehow for future use — not every user earns sats directly on Nostr.
With a Lightning wallet, nobody can see the transaction flow outside the Nostr ecosystem. But with an on-chain wallet, I don`t have that option.
From my point of view, just because Lightning zaps aren`t perfectly private doesn`t mean I want something much worse and completely doxx my transaction flow to Nostr for the sake of convenience.
Also, as a user, I was able to control whether I wanted to receive zaps on Nostr or not at all (by setting or not setting a Lightning address in my Nostr profile, or changing it whenever I wanted). But by adding this feature (on-chain zaps), anybody can send funds to me against my will.
With a Lightning wallet, nobody can see the transaction flow outside the Nostr ecosystem. But with an on-chain wallet, I don`t have that option.
From my point of view, just because Lightning zaps aren`t perfectly private doesn`t mean I want something much worse and completely doxx my transaction flow to Nostr for the sake of convenience.
Also, as a user, I was able to control whether I wanted to receive zaps on Nostr or not at all (by setting or not setting a Lightning address in my Nostr profile, or changing it whenever I wanted). But by adding this feature (on-chain zaps), anybody can send funds to me against my will.