And who said that as Bitcoin grows, running a node was supposed to stay inexpensive?

It just feels like the BIP110’ers have a vision on what they want and are not letting Bitcoin move freely. ‘Centralization’ ‘spam’ seem like labels for ‘I want control over what Bitcoin looks like’

Of course big actors were going to get involved. Of course big miners in the most developed nations were going to take control over the hashrate. But again, I feel this is all short minded. If future global trade will be settled in bitcoin, it’s not wrong to expect nations will start to capture some of the hash and democratize it. We’re at a point we’re the most economically developed nations are seeing bitcoins potential and joining ship

All these BIP110ers are way too focused on what Bitcoin is at this exact moment, and aren’t looking at what it may look like in the future as more of the global population gets onboard