Yes, we are at an impasse. You hold capitalism close to your heart like any any religious zealot would do. You deny evidence, and historical data that proves capitalism is the cause of corruption. You...
I appreciate your composure, I would have done without the religious zealot reference but that's alright, considering how some debaters here like to casually call people "retards".
I keep rejecting the premises, sorry not sorry! We could argue amiably for the rest of our lives about how free market could invent some creative solution to the issues you present, but NOT as a means to prove that property rights are right or wrong, since property rights are the principles we first need to agree about to keep debating. I don't necessarily care to find right now a deterministic solution to their enforcement, not as much as stating that they are sacred.
Stefan (actually not "Stephan") calls this impasse the "the game of the gun".
At the end of the day, whatever the arguments on both sides may be, who is the one holding the other at gunpoint to force him to agree?
Which side will recur to violence in order to force a peaceful individual minding his own business in his own land/house/factory, to forfeit at least part of his wealth, which he earned with his work/time/entrepreneurship, to be redistributed however the regulator decides?
I keep rejecting the premises, sorry not sorry! We could argue amiably for the rest of our lives about how free market could invent some creative solution to the issues you present, but NOT as a means to prove that property rights are right or wrong, since property rights are the principles we first need to agree about to keep debating. I don't necessarily care to find right now a deterministic solution to their enforcement, not as much as stating that they are sacred.
Stefan (actually not "Stephan") calls this impasse the "the game of the gun".
At the end of the day, whatever the arguments on both sides may be, who is the one holding the other at gunpoint to force him to agree?
Which side will recur to violence in order to force a peaceful individual minding his own business in his own land/house/factory, to forfeit at least part of his wealth, which he earned with his work/time/entrepreneurship, to be redistributed however the regulator decides?