I looked it up. The issuance of BIP110 is closer to that of BIP148 than BIP341.
I see your point regarding a small minority making broad changes to the protocol setting a bad precedence.
I think th...
BIP-148 was a user-activated soft fork to enforce existing rules (SegWit readiness), not create new filtering criteria. BIP-110 is different. It introduces content-based filtering that didn't exist before. And 'weighing each BIP independently' is exactly how you get death by a thousand cuts. Each precedent makes the next one easier to justify.