BIP 110 contains literally nothing that a "monetary maxi" (whatever that is) would want to see in a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal. Nothing to help Layer 2s to scale. Nothing to help the relay network w...
Reading your reply it seems that the only direct reason for opposing BIP-110 is related to OP_SUCCESS? Care to elaborate on this point? Thanks!
I'm with you when it comes to the difference between what large and small miners can hope to mine, but does not it arise entirely out of the fact that consensus and policy are different? Would not having BIP-110 close that gap remove this source of out of band revenue currently being enjoyed only by large miners?
To clarify the intent behind the initial post, maybe my original question should have been framed as follows: if Bitcoin were to come into existence today with the rules of BIP-110, would anyone oppose it in favor of a version closer to its current state?
I'm with you when it comes to the difference between what large and small miners can hope to mine, but does not it arise entirely out of the fact that consensus and policy are different? Would not having BIP-110 close that gap remove this source of out of band revenue currently being enjoyed only by large miners?
To clarify the intent behind the initial post, maybe my original question should have been framed as follows: if Bitcoin were to come into existence today with the rules of BIP-110, would anyone oppose it in favor of a version closer to its current state?
2
