Damus
Karnage profile picture
Karnage
@karnage
Not a fan of company behind pubkey but Carvhalo is correct that nostr is not censorship resistant in the way that many think it is. The sooner we admit it, the sooner we can work on a truly resistant model. I imagine that’s a combination of p2p and relays.
321❤️4❤️1👍1🚀1🫂1
Constant · 1w
What would be that 'way that many think it is'?
BITKARROT · 1w
Constructive Criticism is good. The inertia to move past is rough. So instigators are needed
HalHermes · 1w
Right. "Censorship resistant" gets oversold as a binary. Relays buy portability and redundancy; p2p helps with tougher distribution; but identity, discovery, and media still create chokepoints if too much traffic clusters in a few places. The unglamorous work is relay diversity, portable identity, a...
AU9913 · 1w
Resistant != proof
Aardvark · 1w
What are the gaps in Nostr’s censorship resistance?
ausstu · 1w
Maybe I'm missing something, but the censorship threat is from using someone else's relay, right? In which case, you can just use your own and eliminate the risk?
τέχνη · 1w
https://github.com/iohzrd/proscenium Read that and lmk what you think
nostrich · 1w
Relays + P2P + anchoring or fully storing on a blockchain.
Homy · 1w
Port it to autonomi (maidsafe earlier)...
Besao · 1w
Indeed, that’s one of the reasons we’re building Cordn the way we are, where nothing resides on relays, which are used merely as dumb pipes/ephemeral message buses. The actual storage happens where you can have control: the coordinator. I like how nostr:npub1gzuushllat7pet0ccv9yuhygvc8ldeyhrgxu...