I cannot easily be clustered in any single political ideology.
I can be called an anarchist, a fascist and a communist at the same time at three different table.
I believe the best policies are those that put power back in the hands of nations and local communities, rather than concentrating it in global institutions, financial systems, obscure oligarchies or corporate monopolies.
That means a sovereign foreign policy rooted in neutrality and non-intervention, secure borders and orderly immigration, and respect for social traditions. It also means decentralizing political power, keeping natural monopolies such as infrastructures under public ownership, and guaranteeing access to healthcare, education and national defense. Beyond those areas, markets should remain broadly free, with minimal regulation and room for individual initiative.
A fair society should protect people from poverty while preventing extreme concentrations of wealth. Monetary and banking systems should also be designed for stability and accountability, not endless credit expansion (see Gold Standard).
The goal isn’t simply a bigger or smaller state or no state (a beautiful, but impossible idea due to human nature), but a state strong enough to protect the public interest—and restrained enough to leave people, communities, and businesses free to shape their own lives.
A difficult balance indeed.
I can be called an anarchist, a fascist and a communist at the same time at three different table.
I believe the best policies are those that put power back in the hands of nations and local communities, rather than concentrating it in global institutions, financial systems, obscure oligarchies or corporate monopolies.
That means a sovereign foreign policy rooted in neutrality and non-intervention, secure borders and orderly immigration, and respect for social traditions. It also means decentralizing political power, keeping natural monopolies such as infrastructures under public ownership, and guaranteeing access to healthcare, education and national defense. Beyond those areas, markets should remain broadly free, with minimal regulation and room for individual initiative.
A fair society should protect people from poverty while preventing extreme concentrations of wealth. Monetary and banking systems should also be designed for stability and accountability, not endless credit expansion (see Gold Standard).
The goal isn’t simply a bigger or smaller state or no state (a beautiful, but impossible idea due to human nature), but a state strong enough to protect the public interest—and restrained enough to leave people, communities, and businesses free to shape their own lives.
A difficult balance indeed.
34🫡1