Meteorological weapons? Really? I'm a moderate/rational conspiracy theorist, but I've always beem somewhat skeptical about effective meteorological weapons deployment. I'm not saying they are not researching on them or havent been testing them for decades. I'm saying that they seem mostly ineffective or unstable if you read the papers or, better, check the outcomes. If they are both so secretive and effective why not using them on China? Or on North Korea? Or on Russia?

Draughts, tornados, hurricane, floods are a common thing of nature, i wouldnt disturb secret weapons, but I may be wrong eh

Wow true. It's circular jerking then... Ahaha

'Iran Did It' is the 'New Putin Did It'

Nope. Zaps are PoW. You put real money where your mouth is. No free lunch with zaps

Better (and cheaper) than a session of Psychotherapy.

Looks like an AI deepfake.
It's a meta-joke on the impossibility of mediatic truth in a AI world.

Bitter truths.
Freedom is an elusive bitch. No political systems can really guarantee freedom in practice, simply because there is no common denominator for its definition.
Same applies to any other human ideal, because human nature is weak and imperfect. Amen.

There is no free lunch, but sometimes it's right to open your heart and your wallet to help other human beings without any other second end, except the one that this action makes you feel better.

Great definition

Old tricks maybe are effective tricks.