Damus
liminal 🦠 · 132w
Changing your view as time goes on is human and to be expected, there shouldn't be a reason to censor your past self. In a possible scenario if the author is ashamed of their previous view or action...
nobody profile picture
I disagree. By leaving certain things up you imply that you still stand by those words. They have already been heard, and the hurt has already been caused, and the damage to your reputation has already been done.

Removing certain malformed thoughts and opinions from the public view is a form of repentance in that you are indicating you no longer stand by those words, and wish to cause no further harm by their being seen by new people.

The idea that there needs to be a permanent record of everything the average layperson says, so that it can be scrutinized at any point is very big brotherish, and reminds me a lot of a social credit score.

Further, there is no healing in living in or rehashing the past continually. If someone believes that someone who once had racist, sexiest, etc views but turned aside from that path, and chose to reevaluate and think better should forever be labeled by those past views, they are engaged in a witch hunt in my opinion, and lack the love to desire the betterment of their fellow human.
2❤️1🤙3
ben · 132w
you can’t delete a sent email and no one seems to care about that. why is nostr different?
Shawn · 132w
Bitcoin requires extreme accountability. So does nostr.
nobody · 132w
you may disagree - but no, you don't imply you stand by them. if you evolve your opinion - you add perspective later. otherwise there is no historiography for the origin of concept. just like you don't extract memories from your human brain and pretend they didn't occur at the expense of everyone yo...