nostr:nprofile1qqsqddupn4l3cl65wggcyehd009g0pwuatsfudh28f90vewx68vrylqprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem9w3ekzen9vfhhstnpwpcz7qglwaehxw309ashgmrpwvhxummnw3ezumrpdejz76twwehkjcm9wvq3jamnwvaz7tm9wdcx2mrgduhxw6tjd9hx7tn0wfnj70wag7g

Charles hoskinson

i don't know post quantum strategist on nostr, for what?

Gm

I think the questions are similar in the end. Do we want hash-based signatures? Lattice-based? Both? Neither? One advantage of that we can be more relaxed about signatures sizes in Nostr. If a Nostr event is 64k, then I don't mind attaching a 3kb signature And Nostr will be able to move more quick...

Wot

Our team did, but conclusion: there is very little to talk about. Dilithium signatures are fine, latency is acceptable, events look comical but that's a UI issue. It would be dilithium or nothing I think, falcon is floating point and needs a highly curated environment (which nostr is definitely not)...