Damus
Paolo Guarnerio · 191w
Hard-earned sats feel more valuable though.
acronym · 191w
Maybe time better spent just stacking them.
Ben Justman🍷 · 191w
Rare Coins exist in Fiat and it works fine. This doesn't come off as some huge attack to me. A few sats in a haystack
unit · 191w
💯👆
Keysa - Simplest Bitcoin Edu · 191w
1 sat = 1 sat "rare sats" do not exist all sats are rare 🧡
Deleted Account · 191w
True, all the other shit will come and go. Bitcoin will remain the same 🧡
mandalorianHODL · 191w
completely retarded who thinks otherwise
Hendrix · 191w
They should change it to the 69th sat in the second output, that would for sure be more valuable.
sudocarlos · 191w
My take away from what I've heard Casey discuss on your show and #[2] 's is that you must first subscribe to the idea that sats can be tracked from inputs to outputs and I just disagree with this too. Someone could come along tomorrow and point out a flaw in the way that this is being tracked and ex...
Jed ₿ridges · 191w
Sats are scarce… even better
Based Kraken · 191w
🎯
Alfred Hodler · 191w
Enemies of monetary fungibility are enemies of humanity. They want slavery for you.
untraceable · 191w
hm idk man, if 1 sat = 1 sat and they were all equal, we wouldn't need coinjoin. Inscriptions didn't change anything, but it did take advantage of sats being distinguishable but if you wanna say your sats "identify as" fungible, I will try and address them as such to not hurt their feelings. eit...
Gigi · 191w
All sats are rare sats.
James3v9 · 191w
Imagine trying to trade your 1 "rare sat" for 2 "regular sats" - expect to be declined
Glow ⚡️ · 191w
Even satoshi's sats are not rare. Because sats are only numbers in a ledger. (Satoshi UTXOs have a special power though, when they move people will panic!)
BitcoinBufo · 191w
Every sat is rare
Zen Ben · 191w
But people will pay more to own a sat that they view as special in some way.
mchotbot · 191w
Your post is making an impact. Added to the https://member.cash/hot feed
BTChodl · 191w
Satoshi’s Sats are rare Sats 😉
waxwing · 191w
Sats do not exist at all.
Scott · 191w
All sats are rare. Stack accordingly
kepford · 191w
What I love about all this is that if people wanna do silly stuff with their sats they can. Bitcoin keeps chugging along unfazed. Permission-less
marcp · 191w
Either that or they are all "rare". Either way all sats are equal. Fungibility is essential for Money.
nostrich · 191w
Bitcoin is scarce enough.
Florin Hilbay · 191w
phew
alanajoy · 191w
Nor do “bitcoin NFT’s” 😤 https://youtube.com/shorts/P24ElTdjI_Y?feature=share
Rich Nost · 191w
Congrats. You threw money into something that slowed up the blockchain for two weeks and only has meaning as long as there are people who interpret on-chain data given a very specific way that hasn't even been formalized in a BIP. Sounds like a cult. WOW CASEY IS A GENIUS.
NostrDANus · 191w
Maybe, there will be a time, before hyperbitcoinization, where some ordinal sats are less worthy then non ordinal sats.
OceanSlim · 191w
Yes they do. All sats are rare.
Tristan Brice Velloza Kildaire · 191w
Rare SATs exist man
TheFish · 191w
Good point, big fan of the bible ordinals and 3d printing plns though
Pirate HODL · 191w
Oh really, tell that to sat number 69420deadbeef1337
Chilidem · 190w
How is this supposed to work anyways? When a UTXO is partially spent and split to two different addresses, are both newly created UTXOs "special" coins? I really don't get the mindset behind these people.