I asked @The Beave 1 question about discoverability: how is it that I struggle to find people interested in something as ordinary as sailing or bread baking, while others encounter a very specific category of sexually explicit content that isn't algorithmically promoted and is routinely muted or blocked.

You responded by directing me to “18 relays full of smut you're looking for.” Since I was looking for sailing and baking, I asked whether labeling those as smut was a common Nostr practice or your personal misinterpretation.

I might've understood why my question triggered you so much if the pictures of the “sexy parts du jour” happened to be predominantly taken aboard sailboats by women holding freshly baked focaccia.

You've now publicly characterized my question about discoverability as an attempt to find smut and subsequently accused me of defending “literal prostitutes.” That's a pretty severe mischaracterization of what I actually said.

You're entitled to disagree with the definition of misogyny, but you're not entitled to invent my intentions and present them as facts.

And here's another possibility worth considering in a discussion about why women don't stay on Nostr: perhaps some leave because an ordinary question can become an exhausting exercise in defending themselves against accusations they never invited.

And I’m out of what, exactly? lol