Damus
Lyn Alden profile picture
Lyn Alden
@LynAlden
What would it look like, if an emergent money was being monetized?

Often when I talk with academics or other high-IQ critics of bitcoin, it’s the volatility and seemingly speculative aspect of it that turns them off. It’s almost distasteful to them. They can get behind the idea of global open-source payments and so forth, “but that’s not why people buy it” they’ll say. “They buy it because they’re speculating. It’s too volatile for its own good.” Some aspect of them dislikes it in principle, almost *because* one can make money from it.

But a new decentralized money, including its own unit of account and liquidity, doesn’t just emerge as a multi-trillion dollar-equivalent network out of the box. In order to go from zero to trillions in market capitalization and liquidity, it needs upside volatility. And with upside volatility comes speculation, leverage, and downside volatility. Cycle after cycle, it’s priced like an option. At first it’s like a 0.1% chance that it succeeds in the long run. And then in the next cycle it’s like 1%. And then in the next cycle it’s like 5%, and so forth. So, early capital allocators that have seen a thing or two and know the high failure rate of new ideas will say, “This’ll probably fail, but if it doesn’t, both the investment gains and the macro implications will be enormous.” And then 15 years into it with a few more cycles under its belt, the probability of success looks less like a distant moonshot and more like a real possibility, and then eventually starts to look like the base case. In the beginning the question is, “how will this succeed?” and at later stages the question becomes, “what risks could prevent this from continuing to succeed?”

The process of buying bitcoin is often a speculative process at first, but then as people learn more, they often view it differently. Those that really want speculation will then continue down the pipeline of altcoins- there’s always some shiny new object to try to speculate on. On the other hand, those who begin viewing bitcoin as money, start to view it as a defensive or risk-off act to hold a piece of this liquid and globally decentralized network of value. One would feel too financially exposed not to.
2737❤️56🤙76❤️5💜4👍3🔥3
Vinceko⚡️ · 127w
👍🫂
🐉AT ₿01 · 127w
Smart comfortable clowns. Compound inflation will really turn their attitudes around.
reebs · 127w
🎯
someone · 127w
Once big funds understand it is uncorrelated and unstoppable some will allocate for sure. Some will never allocate, because buying it means acceptance of the existing structure as failed. Isn't high volatility actually good for better rebalancing? Eventually everyone will understand not playing th...
B I T K H A N · 127w
I used to get frustrated with seemingly never ending turmoil of Bitcoin markets and adoption. In hindsight it’s playing out exactly as it should though. The boom and bust cycles, the fraud and bankruptcies, the civil war etc, etc have all been necessary to get this far.
Cristina · 127w
I call all of this "growing pains". It's natural, I say to those that fight me.
Habanero · 127w
The academics don't like bitcoin because it cuts off their funding. The inflation in the cost of higher education is egregious, and is because the Feds issue the loans that blew the bubble. Those academics don't want to give up their spot next to the money spigot.
anon · 127w
🎯
Mnm · 127w
It's been a few years since I decided its their turn to demonstrate how will Bitcoin fail had not me to prove why it works.
Captain Jack Sparo · 127w
I think their main concern still needs to be addressed. Namely how an asset with high volatility can be used as a currency. Imagine trying to take a loan in BTC, you will have no idea how much it’s going to cost to repay. For those that argue stating the high inflation with today's fiat, keep ...
Murray von Nakamoto · 127w
Intellectuals yet idiots, as Taleb (who, granted, has a stain on his reputation now) called them. What I love about Bitcoin is that these losers have the massive personal cost of being wrong staring them in the face at all times in the form of the Bitcoin price. They cannot transfer the cost of b...
Kostas · 127w
their failure to understand is priced in, and gives us a unique premium
cadayton · 127w
What do the academics think of the USD banking cartel (FED)? Understanding the true nature of fiat money, I don't see how anyone would want to support it. If USD was still on the gold standard, I'm pretty sure Bitcoin would have never been created.
annica · 127w
Humility, curiosity, open minded, abstract complex causal thinking, intuition, patience and hope are all attributes that help some one ‘get it quicker. High IQ individuals that relies only on high IQ to figure it out can clearly see why it won’t work ( insert reason here) , they typically are ...
Sven, der junge Krieger · 127w
Maybe the halving and the volatility it cause, is the main driver of adaption and one of the best bitcoin features.
₿it Achachi 🕳️🐇 · 127w
What these high-IQ fiat funded morons don't understand is that Bitcoin has no counterpartyrisk.
Marinatin · 127w
Word
Brunswick · 127w
The personality profile of academics includes risk aversion. This is why they settle into a giant institution that will guarantee their livelihood until they die. They are also most prone to avoiding criticism, most of their career and social environment is rewarded for their compliance and agreeabl...
Obi-₿it Koinobi · 127w
The last line about feeling exposed rings loud. When I first started buying bitcoin I felt like I was throwing money away. When I don't buy it now I feel like I'm throwing money away and it's a stronger feeling now than it was when I first started buying.
nobody · 126w
Brilliant