nostr:npub126ntw5mnermmj0znhjhgdk8lh2af72sm8qfzq48umdlnhaj9kuns3le9ll You shouldn't get involved beyond offering the various Bitcoin "clients"; all you'll do is damage your reputation, and that's a sh...
This is the most milquetoast approach to the whole debate, especially if you offer a node in a box product.
It's a demonstrable fact that if there is no existing URSF, then a UASF is more likely to succeed. And also he's saying that if you want to switch between implementations, they're making it super easy. How is this a contemptible stance?
It's a demonstrable fact that if there is no existing URSF, then a UASF is more likely to succeed. And also he's saying that if you want to switch between implementations, they're making it super easy. How is this a contemptible stance?
1
