🥂 - Petition to make this emoji standard in the CLINK UI space.

Moreso you being aggressive while not reading. I said WHAT CHANGED motherfucker. What fucking changed about Nostr or X? THAT is the LARP you thick fuck.

So when he went Nostr only that was just a LARP. Nothing changed between the value proposition of Nostr versus X. X is still a centralized cesspool.

Why go Nostr only? Why not do both and not make a big deal out of it? Because he is less convicted now than he was before. I don't care for the aggressive tone so, you can keep typing away but I think the value demonstrations are pretty obvious.

No.

Every new technology was a void at its inception. But if a guy in a car looked around and said "everyone is still riding horses, I guess cars are a bust" that would tell you something about his conviction in the new technology he's using.

What do you mean? Made no sense? In those moments yes, Nostr is more important. I could be with my wife and attentive, I am not. I am replying to you.

Of all available options, we choose what we want to do in that moment and that choice relays to others what we value.

At any given time I may be with my family or on my computer. What I spend the majority of the time doing or being around shows my value. If being with my family is not available, then it's not being weighted. (Though that may be a cost benefit analysis: I could leave my job in the middle of the shift to be with my wife, but she would be pretty angry if I got tired over it.)

I am saying he doesn't believe that the Nostr protocol is worth spending as much time on as X. That says something about what he values. "Building" as they say.

Your time is finite. Implicit in your expenditure of it is a proclamation of value. What you spend your life doing is what is important to you. This is an admission that Nostr is less important to Odell. If I put it in bitcoin terms people would call me lettuce hands and low conviction.

Your lawyer can't?

Does anybody else think the term "Exit Liquidity" sounds gross as hell? Why not just call them pee-pee people or jizz beings?

You are incorrect about privacy.
Common law is nonsense.
Damus is Canadian.
Grinder is German.
An extortion threat is still a threat.
The sender's email address is not private information.
Claiming legal liability IS a threat in an of itself.

Anyway, I'm not really interested in doing this thread again. Read my other replies if you want more clarity.

I guess I have a different perspective on trust. I never start with a trust assumption even if they are respected or an authority. I understand some/many people have the opposite approach. This does seem to burn them often which is why I have my approach.

I do however conceptually respect transparency of "Publishing all takedown requests" as a way to at least notify those using his relay of attempts at censorship.

It is unfortunate for Grinder that he made a privacy mistake. (I have nothing against him at all) But I find a takedown request (using the state to get what you want) personally more unacceptable.

Difference of opinion perhaps. But, I really respect your approach to discussing it. No ill will toward you at all.

I have heard of them, they are ineffectual. Default judgment in this matter would have no enforceable consequences.