Damus
Open in Damus
JackTheMimic profile picture
JackTheMimic
@nostrich

Hoch die anarchie. I do stuff, I make stuff, I am funny, but also, the CTO at Sovreign.io

npub1m50e65pv09ga73lglrkjgh5tlgj006pv9rce8xdg7rn5kps38gssh2glzqnpub
Relays (7)
  • wss://relay.primal.net/ – read & write
  • wss://relay.damus.io/ – write
  • wss://nos.lol/ – write
  • wss://nostr.land/ – read
  • wss://nostrelites.org/ – read
  • wss://aggr.nostr.land/ – read
  • wss://relay.noswhere.com/ – read

Recent Notes

JackTheMimic profile picture
@rabble
Just a few notes on Divine.

- After 10 mins of use the app slows down significantly. (Sluggish, slow to respond to button presses, video loading very noticeable)

- The square video recording should not ever display in fullscreen as it cuts off most of the side frame.

- Pressing the Home icon should scroll feed to the top most recent in the category selected (for you, new, or following)

- Make profiles selectable from the comment feed.

Positive Notes:

This app so far feels like 2013 vine. Amazing to see people figure it out all over again.

I love finding gems and seeing that they have a great sense of humor or art and finding a fresh new follow.

Love how most won't even realize it's using Nostr as a backbone. Great job.
Noshole · 2w
Sounds like they could use some talent over there 👀
Noshole · 2w
Then I’m sending a flaming turd to your front door. You don’t wanna get into a send off with me. I have a completely open schedule 😂
Noshole · 2w
No. I just know how to use this thing and have no plans to change anytime soon. Take me as I am 😭😭😭😭
Noshole · 2w
I would prefer to keep this npub, but there’s no bunker for iOS to sign in. I can sign in with extension on web 🤷‍♀️
Noshole · 2w
Considering heavily, but nervous 🤭
Sourcenode · 2w
Yes, I think so, but I'm not a mining expert. I see two issues. 1. If most of the pools engage in censorship (Ignore fees) that would end decentralization. This is technically possible, but economic...
 JackTheMimic profile picture
JackTheMimic
Technically in a centralized mining paradigm you would never know about the orphaned blocks with "offending" transactions.

Also they would have to "ignore fees" they just would have an economic incentive to keep the block compliant to their funder's whims. This is SUPPOSED to be the transaction makers but in a "control the transaction flow" system, funders outside of the protocol play a role as well.
note1fhw8r...
JackTheMimic profile picture
JackTheMimic
Not relaying transactions is not censorship. Not mining transactions would be (in a centralized paradigm)
Bitcoin is censorship RESISTANT not censorship proof.

Miners can't "refuse to honor" a block. They would have to build a block on top of the previous block and then mine another block using that mined block as a template before anyone else mined on the "offending block"

The threat is called a 51% attack meaning upon seeing a "non-compliant" block or transaction the centralized mining apparatus would increase hashrate efforts to ensure the next 2 blocks were made as illustrated in the paragraph above. Committing zero hashrate to building upon an offending block.