Previous to the activation height block 965664 (around September 1st) all on chain transactions are seen as valid. After that point miners attempting to mine a transaction like that would produce an invalid block and be rejected by RDTS(BIP110) Nodes.

Also minor mistake in my description before it is "OP NOTIF" not OP ELSEIF as I said before.

lnbc40u1p4y9etlpp520lvvdtw7ad8zccpqujjtpg3f4d8tk5xvxr6h7h0azkg03wdr49qdqqcqzzsxqrrs0sp5extkahkjksq3th3v5a3a3hucus3u3cm4a989czw520f5renklaus9qxpqysgql4d0spju57kwkyyas4msczltl4dak3c252nup03gl0cxevlczy035janfqreu4e0228rq5p4sye3r67cq3jrckme6xwh9wayvkgydqqq6tkgkl

Okay.

I would just say that your comment is like someone walking in the middle of the discussion between Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking, asking what's going on, but telling them to not explain anything technically.

I can explain BIP 110 to you pretty easily. It is a soft fork proposal to tighten the rules of Bitcoin. including limiting OP RETURN 283 bytes, removing the validity of OP IF and OP ELSEIF. Setting limits on tap leafs of a depth of 128. and limiting certain tap scripts to 256 bytes.

Now if all of that seems like gibberish to you, that's why most people just leave it at BIP 110.

Okay.

I don't. I just don't understand the gripe exactly. Do you want people to not mention something you don't want to hear about?

Literally not at all. Just point your lightning node at either node implementation, and if the other one wins, just point it at another node.

It would be emergent. Also, this is a terrible experiment.😬

Chu talm bout? Do you want them to post the entire BIP with technicals every time they mention the thing or what?

So you aren't making a list then? Lol.

Which part is wrong? I said two different scenarios, didn't assign probabilities.

As Average Gary likes to say, mining shares are shitcoins.