Looked at @nprofile1q...'s Signals page (https://creativecommons.org/ai-and-the-commons/cc-signals/) again.
I think this subheading is basically the smoking gun:
"If everyone blocks access, everyone loses. How can we avoid this path?"
This fully falls into the "there is no alternative to AI" camp and from that assumption there really are not many paths to take. Question is: Why take that stance?
I think this subheading is basically the smoking gun:
"If everyone blocks access, everyone loses. How can we avoid this path?"
This fully falls into the "there is no alternative to AI" camp and from that assumption there really are not many paths to take. Question is: Why take that stance?
1
