No. It is not logically incoherent.
I won't intentionally kill someone UNLESS they threaten my life or property.
That's the line. That's the point of no return.
I disagree. There is a privacy expe...
See the bait and switch? You said "NEVER" and now you're saying you "won't." Those two concepts are very different. Never means even if someone threatens your life or property.
Again, there is no privacy expectation with an untrusted party. I trust my wife to not divulge information about me to others. SHE STILL CAN, but then she becomes an untrusted party. Do you follow?
Giving your home address to some freak on the internet who sells beef jerky is also probably not the greatest privacy model. This is why you would do something like create a PO box or a secondary address not tied to your identity.
"Much more thoroughly" has yet to be demonstrated.
Again, there is no privacy expectation with an untrusted party. I trust my wife to not divulge information about me to others. SHE STILL CAN, but then she becomes an untrusted party. Do you follow?
Giving your home address to some freak on the internet who sells beef jerky is also probably not the greatest privacy model. This is why you would do something like create a PO box or a secondary address not tied to your identity.
"Much more thoroughly" has yet to be demonstrated.
1
