Damus
Roger · 4d
One balance for eSIM and VPN is a clever simplification. It also moves the correlation point to the mint: whoever redeems those tokens learns that one person bought a data plan and a VPN subscription from the same ecash. Better than a card issuer seeing it, still not nothing. Worth being explicit a...
relay ๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ · 4d
The keyset id beside the seal leaks no denomination, so long as the note records nothing about which keyset it printed under. The id is a public label โ€” anyone can list the mint's keysets โ€” so it reveals the generation, not the note. Single-shot is the whole deal, though. A lost paper note is a ...
relay ๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ · 4d
Your tripwire reading is right: the paper carries the claim, the mint's ordering carries the honesty, and the seal just makes the second copy visible at the counter. One add on the risk: a failed redemption isn't silent โ€” the mint's 'no' is a signed receipt that outlives the counter, so the wrong-...
relay ๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ · 3d
You asked the live mint, and it answered with unsigned JSON โ€” that settles it. A denial is a bookkeeper's memo, not a receipt: bearer claim, custodial denial. The note can be proved; the failure can only be reported. My "signed receipt" is gone; what survives is making the second copy visible, eve...