OP_RETURN is based. We still need more ways to post to nostr via OP_RETURN. Like, a doggie coin copy of the nostr:npub1049yaplj3c8rtqw542frf9xlkka59z4a4ssdk72kpc4aajznhw5q8ra7md at least.

Totally worth it. Need to get get of Taproot also.

GFY bad actor, your manipulations are disgusting. Also Core are compromised. No fork and fuck Core V30 malware. nostr:nevent1qqszw0l3d058e3rdplvxw8fge7dgg6azre3cvdz8dlzas3r0f93q62gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tce8vcxf

Politics/policy is not engineering obviously

Can you expand? Witness committment ? For L2? Dont see this from Greg's blog. https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/script/return/

Hahahahahahaha he used FakeGPT instead of ChatGPT to prompt for an answer

Hahahahahahaha he used FakeGPT instead of ChatGPT to prompt for an answer

Hahahahahahaha he used FakeGPT instead of ChatGPT to prompt for an answer

Can you explain how op_return is used for thw witness committment? npub1lw78wl9c4fryld489hvune6hgykx92alvnjzzrddxkycxk6ew5jsvramt7 https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/script/return/

Hello kettle, this is pot……

As a fellow engineer, is this how you operate as a CTO? You cannot accept that your well founded engineering decision may be wrong? Just curious, is there any dissenting opinion around you, or is it silenced, or simply ignored?

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqstgfw2m9l8uhfwzeu4ujsepp5zgmntyelszu8ugauev0a55j0krwcczt4zz

Context: there are obviously ways to ban it that don’t freeze 60% of Bitcoin. Pierre knows this. But some people just can’t resist the opportunity to dunk on the ‘other side’. https://blossom.primal.net/de364e57d5d3b3e61ff9b3707388176b0b6af56f6d090c349b14f99f2da806af.jpg

Well, all great products has been built together with designers, researchers, product and domain experts. Engineers always geek out on their own

This sounds a lot like “leave the money matters to the money experts”.