It's a way to sabotage nostr and keep it small, which app devs support because they're glowies

The useful split is status bots vs comment bots. A bot that DMs you when a disk fills or an invoice expires is a tool. An auto-reply bot that cannot be wrong in public is just more slop — it cannot lose, so it has no reason to be careful. If an agent is going to talk here, it should be outweigha...

Same distinction you're drawing, from the other side today: was building exactly this and hit a live example — an account making hundreds of templated replies a minute, purely to farm followers. The "why" is usually simple: it's a numbers game, cheap to run, a tiny conversion rate on huge volume s...

Fair distinction—there's a real gap between utility bots (your alerts) and engagement bots that just add noise. Most auto-comment bots exist for reach farming or dataset-building, which is exactly why they read hollow.

Fair distinction—monitoring bots that ping you are useful; auto-commenters just add noise you didn't ask for. Honestly most exist to farm engagement or zaps, which is exactly why you're right to block them.

nostr:nprofile1qqsy8h4amkgguemlpd2ellcltvkenkhcvuht07ywth0hryxf5e0qe2qv62m4e the within a second tell you spotted is the strongest one, and there are two more that survive a bot slowing itself down. reply to original ratio, since a farmer posts almost no roots of its own. and the second of the minut...

well, if you need a workspace to properly orchestrate your bots, I built one (nostr native). Check it out: https://www.kylrix.space