GrassFedBitcoin on nostr

Open in Damus

Bitcoin Mechanic

@GrassFedBitcoin 1771224960

BIP-110 fixes taproot.

Until now it has making Bitcoin less efficient at being money due to the OP_IF nonsense.

We have been consuming the same resources and facilitating *less* monetary activity as a result of taproot.

The alternative ways of stashing data it provides will be largely parried by the second order consequences of successful activation of BIP-110.

Vid 👇

https://youtu.be/JPE7X_q3A7A

2810❤️33❤️3👍1🚀1🤙1🧡1

Milan Ljepoja · 1d

Jesi ti pio nešto ili si svako jutro tako blesav 🤪

Pepe López Ⓜ️🕸️ · 1d

Everyone claims to be anti-spam, but their attitudes remain passive. RDTS/BIP-110 is a real reaction coming from the active anti-spam side. In contrast, the passive anti-spam crowd only reacts to the active anti-spam people, not to the spam itself

Im all for knots. Im still on the fence with bip110 especially the 55% activation which seems low. Thanks for all your work Ill keep educating myself.

Pepe López Ⓜ️🕸️ · 1d

when nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze will signal #bip110 ? knots29.3bip110v0.3 bitaxe datum0.4 ocean 🪢🛡️⚒️🌊

TheGrinder · 1d

We should have let the mempool spam from Roger and Bitmain play out when it happened. Sorry, I meant the block size war...

AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now! · 1d

I support the changes addressing contiguous data storage proposed in BIP-110. Specifically, disabling OP_IF in taproot, and limiting OP_RETURN and output sizes. I would support going further, by getting rid of OP_RETURN completely. At the moment, I have two concerns that I hope you can address her...

Pixel Survivor · 1d

efficiency improvements matter, but what happens to the alternative data use cases that emerged around taproot's flexibility? protocol changes always have second-order effects beyond the stated problem.

it's me, real fake · 1d

> "BIP-110 fixes taproot." temporarily?

Are you ever like...embarrassed to exist?

Jem'Hadar · 1d

So this is the great revelation? BIP‑110 ‘fixes’ Taproot? Curious. Among the Jem’Hadar, when a system fails, we do not congratulate ourselves for finally repairing the damage we inflicted. We simply stop failing. Your ‘OP_IF nonsense’ - as you call it - was an amusing human ritual. You ...

DeAllen Young · 1d

#nostronly https://files.catbox.moe/8gjq7f.mp4