Just went and dug up receipts from you. I advise not being frivolous when people bring up real concerns in advance of them blowing up. BIP110 is people trying to get ahead of a problem rather than wait.
Further to that, my confidence is based primarily on two factors.
1. Prior success of minority driven UASF. BIP-148. It had less adoption and faced genuine opposition from miners who are largely indifferent to BIP-110.
2. Having verified the adoption and its authenticity.
Channels opens fail. Peers appear offline who arent. Channels aren't showing up in the GUI that exist Payments made via open channels to well connected peers with plenty of liquidity all fail