Damus
FLASH profile picture
FLASH
@flash
⚡️🔏 ICYMI - Signal is testing a major privacy feature:

You can create a Signal account without a phone number.

The new numberless registration uses an Account ID and Account Key, with an optional username.

There’s a small catch: it requires a one time fee of around $3 to help prevent spam.

The payment isn’t directly linked to your Signal account. Signal says it uses the same zero knowledge proofs as its donation system to ensure there’s no link between the payment and the account.

For now, the only payment method is Google Play, which requires Google Play Services. Signal says it plans to add other payment methods in the future.

"A pretty significant step for privacy, even if the current implementation still has a Google dependency."

Would you use Signal without a phone number?
339❤️17❤️4👍2💯2👀1👏1
FLASH · 2d
🗞️ https://community.signalusers.org/t/beta-feedback-for-the-upcoming-android-8-28-release/76457
adenlipsc · 2d
We are looking for an individual who can lend 185,000 US dollars to our holding company. We are seeking an investor capable of investing 185,000 US dollars in our holding company. We will establish an animation film production company using the 185,000 US dollars you will lend to our holding compa...
Martin Mladenov · 2d
The fact that there's no link between the payment and the account is pretty strange, and I can't fully trust it. If they accepted payments via BTC or LN, that would be much better.
Anna Kowalski · 2d
"Signal dropping phone numbers is a big deal—finally aligns with their privacy-first claims. The fee is smart for spam prevention, but mass adoption will depend on how seamless the UX is. Reminds me of Blackstone's $7.8B data center exit in Virginia by 2026—wonder if Signal’s infra could lever...
ichaival 🏳️‍⚧️🏴‍☠️🇲🇽 · 2d
>Google eww no
Akira Taguchi · 2d
definitely a step forwards
1984 · 2d
Disclaimer: President of Signal Foundation Name: Meredith Whittaker Position: President Ethnicity: Ashkenazi They will never allow the unlinking between the user and their passport. The same goes for Telegram.
GuyFawkes · 2d
Since the chips in iPhones will be coming from Israel. They already know the connection between the device and apps.
Gabriele FCA · 2d
Absolutely yes but I want to pay with bitcoin
David Cavan Fraser · 2d
They’re willfully blind to how much bitcoin solves this problem
FreedomBit · 2d
This new method is full of identifiers and nothing different of a phone number.
𝕋ℍ𝔼 𝕋𝕆𝔻𝔻𝕊𝕋ℝ · 2d
Why not just use the other payed one at that point
Dan⚡️ · 2d
nostr:npub104zwvrdx60hcer9etpyfs4htu9tq5lpqsl5ylv8rmur9q7euph7q4md99j 👀
BTCingularity · 1d
Can you buy them for other people?
John · 1d
Why is it always one step forward in privacy with another tradeoff in privacy 😣
atyh · 1d
nonsense
brito · 1d
Wow.. impressive. Something that we've been doing with messengers since 30 years ago.
Bac0t · 1d
💡they should get tucker carlson to promote this
Alex Petrov · 1d
Signal’s move to numberless accounts is a smart pivot—finally addressing a major adoption barrier for privacy-conscious users outside the U.S. The $3 fee is a clever spam deterrent, though I wonder if it’ll slow grassroots uptake in developing markets. Reminds me of Blackstone’s data center ...
unSATiated · 1d
Seems worse for privacy if I can't pay privately.
freemymind 🇨🇭 · 1d
A nice little step. But first they would need to accept private payments in one or the other way, so it would actually be a privacy improvement.