Damus
fiatjaf profile picture
fiatjaf
@fiatjaf
Something must be done about the shitcoin scam reply bots and that is NOT telling everybody to block them.
458❤️22🤙23❤️1🍆1🐐1💯1
dolu · 139w
Send deletion event with vote system to relays. If X votes has been sent to a relay, the relay delete all events from the specified pubkey (scammer) + ban all futures events from this pubkey. Not perfect. It requires a specific action for each account. Or a centralized list of scammer pubkeys. Not ...
Julia de JP · 139w
I wouldn't even know how to block them... 😔
npub1ljv5m3x · 139w
It's a problem nostr:npub1f7f97y6acfg03rus6u3kffa6cjxxnx4gjj239u3a4v8pwn0n6vsqkl5eup can resolve.
₿ruce Høpper · 139w
PoW on replies
HoloKat · 139w
Client level opt out block lists.
Sovereign Being · 139w
Zap to reply, or a history of having zapped a user to reply? Perhaps the requirement for a linked wallet which could be checked for a sat balance before one can reply, and users could turn this on or off in their accounts. Just throwing some ideas around, maybe there is something in there.
Carlito · 139w
Opt in block lists? Some could be community managed, others could be managed by clients, or other service providers.
proximus · 139w
Absolutely.
The Daniel 🖖 · 139w
A NIP to impose rate limits at the relay level for npubs posting the same message repeatedly. This should do away with most of it.
Geist · 139w
Still less spam than other platforms, its all about perspective.
someone · 139w
relays could check the history of the replier (and maybe reputation)
Ferris B Sessions · 139w
Agree to a certain extent but spam bots and AI bots will always get one step ahead of us plebs. Providing the user doesn’t see them, who cares if the majority of comments are spam. It’s a bit like a spam email inbox where majority goes to junk. The user doesn’t care about the junk inbox, t...
TKay · 139w
Keywords / Hashtags filtering. Preferably client side.
Melvin Carvalho · 139w
I think we should fight back
CXPLAY · 139w
ture, dude.
Self Wealth 011235813213455 · 139w
Micro payment groups.
gthmg · 139w
PoW, proof of burn, or payment for relay access and PoW to reply. Solving by heuristics at a relay level is difficult.
Ingwie Phoenix (aka. birb) · 139w
Mutes are just a list - why not tell clients to implement the ability to pull mutes fro additional lists that a user may pick, allowing a community approach to filtering on one side? On the other... I guess good implementations or methods to filter incomming posts; mainly thinking of strfry's Write...
Braydon Fuller · 139w
Stats on what relays have the most and least of them could be useful to help pick relays.
mccrmx · 138w
Proof of work must be done.