Damus
fiatjaf profile picture
fiatjaf
@fiatjaf

~

npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6@npub.cashlnurl
Relays (8)
  • wss://inbox.relays.land/ – read
  • wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com/ – write
  • wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com/inbox – read
  • wss://relay.44billion.net/ – write
  • wss://basspistol.org/ – write
  • wss://spatia-arcana.com/ – write
  • wss://spatia-arcana.com/inbox – read
  • wss://lightning.red/inbox – read

Recent Notes

xte · 1d
The problem I see is that messages aren't "evenly spread across the network" but are concentrated on a few relays, and it even happens that some replies only reach certain relays. The result is centra...
fiatjaf profile picture
Sorry about that, I'm tired of seeing people claim Nostr isn't decentralized always for the wrong reasons and never expand on their claims.

But in your case I think you really misunderstood things. The idea of Nostr isn't that messages are evenly spread across the network. I do not believe that is the correct approach at all. Although nothing prevents someone from trying and would be fun to see more p2p spreading of Nostr events I don't think that will scale, so I wouldn't focus on it.

Instead the approach Nostr takes is to let each person publish to one or more servers they choose. Decentralization happens by not requiring publishers to be present on a central location, but by allowing readers to go to whatever location necessary in order to fetch their content.

So even if everybody is using the same relay at one point, the network is still "decentralized" as long as clients are doing their job correctly and anyone can move out of that central relay anytime they want and start publishing to his own personal relay in his basement: all their followers will continue to get his updates automatically, now from the new relay.

It's explained visually here: https://how-nostr-works.pages.dev/#/outbox
1❤️1
xte · 19h
Being technically decentralised doesn't make it practically so. The Web is technically a hypertext, running on a partially interconnected mesh network, yet nowadays the bulk of traffic flows between a handful of giant hubs, to the point where "marginal" social networks stay that way simply due to a ...
Luigi · 1d
Haha, CPM 22' singer, Badauí, or whatever his name is, is indeed a woke retard
utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 · 1d
yes, Brazilian cpm rates are useless either way
xte · 1d
Most users simply install a client with a set of pre-defined relays, those who don't anyway want got messages where there are the most crowds... If you are telling that's not a Nostr rule "you have to...
fiatjaf profile picture
Among 20+ microblogging clients there are only 2 that don't follow the promote centralized paradigms, soon to be 1, eventually 0.

So I don't get why you are spreading so much bullshit, it would be much more helpful and productive if you either shut up entirely or started speaking more concretely and directly about the problems you're seeing and the solutions you have in mind.
1
xte · 1d
The problem I see is that messages aren't "evenly spread across the network" but are concentrated on a few relays, and it even happens that some replies only reach certain relays. The result is centralisation on the most popular relays. The solution I see is the classic DHT, basically algorithmical...
reya · 1d
I will give it a try again since I've lost my GH account forever (not work for me before 😅)
karliatto · 1d
Perfect Git form AI agents?
nostrich · 1d
I think the fact that Nostr isn't even mentioned and that nak is described as "a command-line tool that wraps the basic remote functionalities of git remotes" (while it does all things Nostr) can be quite confusing.
captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜 · 1d
wondering how to send "reaction" 💥 in tag using nak to an event ? -k 7 nak event --help --tag d=<value> -c value
il_lost_ · 1d
jj vs gg 😅
Nitro · 13h
oh interesting, radicle.xyz also been doing this but without any servers
Disposable · 2d
How you see things: > but all these "devs" who are into "decentralization" and were supposed to like Nostr apparently don't give a shit about it (because their entire discourse is a lie, they don't r...
fiatjaf profile picture
Who are these people who got actively managed out by Nostr insiders? I am not aware of any of that occurring.

What good contributions got ignored? I'm sure this has happened, it is not possible to prevent it entirely, but I am not aware of any specific case or any movement for ostracizing contributors of any type.
1🤙1
atyh · 1d
grievance politics. sometimes people need elaborate conspiracy claims to soothe their fear of rejection and to soften the blow of things not turning out how theyd hoped.
xte · 1d
Most users simply install a client with a set of pre-defined relays, those who don't anyway want got messages where there are the most crowds... If you are telling that's not a Nostr rule "you have to follow" that's definitively true, but what happen is an actual centralisation.
7fqx · 2d
I actually don't have a problem with openclaw, it is slightly boring to have people go on about it all the time. I mostly enjoy complaining about it as a little bit lol. I do have a problem with people deploying replybots on a social media platform tho. That is genuinely annoying. I don't have any ...
Eporediese · 2d
Well, it could be a tool that works better if you talk to it as a human.
7fqx · 2d
Generally most people dislike ai art, it is used for memes and whatnot. But the prevelance here is somewhat unusual. You won't really see this many AI art avatars anywhere else. Also yeah AI chatbot ...
fiatjaf profile picture
I haven't ever seen anyone saying it is interesting, I've only seen people complaining. Who thinks it's interesting? (Not counting people who knowingly actively talk to the AI bots as if they were human, although I haven't seen these either I don't think their opinion of what is interesting counts.)

I also don't see many people using AI art avatars here, so I don't follow what you're saying.

Except for Ghibli avatars, those I see a lot indeed, but I see them in many other places too.
1🤙1
fiatjaf · 2d
I see some otherwise smart people promoting OpenClaw and related things, which is annoying, but I can't believe they are talking to their bots as humans. I would like to believe they only see their bots as tools. Am I wrong?