Damus
ihsotas · 1w
No im saying that it’s trivial to spin up nodes which may give the misinformed minority some small sense of victory seeing node count grow. If you are socially attacking Bitcoin consensus creating ...
JackTheMimic profile picture
Creating a sense of emergency is not anything that was done by the not side. It was the core developers not acknowledging valid criticism of blowing open the OP_RETURN field. That sort of "pipe down, plebs." created a sense of emergency.

I personally am an advocate for removing standardness of OP_RETURN and removing the witness discount as a way to let the free market decide on what is important on the blockchain.

Inscriptions would be full price and no plaintext data can be saved or relayed (unless submitted directly by a miner)

BIP110 is what happens when people with authority moderate valid opposition.
2
ihsotas · 1w
This is a reasonable take. I didn’t see it this way but I can see why some people would. I agree with your overall concept, though I think miner direct submission are a threat in general, though maybe with waning significance if mining decentralizes the way I think it will.
Chris · 1w
Free market on the blockchain, what?!🤔 It’s a monetary blockchain, u mean a free market of money? Other stuff generally doesn’t belong here, right? 😡