Damus
ODELL · 3d
> The only risk here is that VC wall st suits scare enough people into doing a URSF and splitting the chain. nope, if bip110 activates with minority hash rate, which will likely be the case, then the...
nicnym #BIP-110 profile picture
I say there is enough consensus because more nodes are running the bip-110 soft fork than during segwit.

The game theory is already in motion.

Miners will obey the tighter rules or they will risk their entire business over 0.1% fee revenue from spam.

You- as a node runner unwilling to upgrade- can sit this one out 👍

Your v25/v28 core node will continue to work fine with the new consensus.

https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/bip-110-the-miners-paradox


2❤️1🤙1
ODELL · 3d
node numbers are easy to fake, proof of work is not segwit had overwhelming consensus, bip110 is not even close your chart leaves out the most likely outcome: bip110 has barely any hash rate at activation, chains split, a small group of miners limp the chain along, while people try to threaten min...
Chazstr · 3d
If spam is only contributing 0.1% to revenue why is it so important to fix the so called spam. Blocks are empty. Fees are 0.