@nicnym #BIP-110
Liberty is acknowledgment and faith in God and his works. - Bastiat
20,999,999.977x100,000,000
Relays (2)
- wss://relay.damus.io – read & write
- wss://relay.primal.net – read & write
Recent Notes
i called the people doing the harassment a lynch mob and thanks for proving my point
Online comments are not harassment woketard
the majority of the technical community, most economic actors, and a majority of miners, supported segwit
the few that didnt forked to bcash
everyone notices your veiled attacks at me every response...
How are they veiled Mr. VC?
You called me and everyone else in support of bip-110 a “lynch-mob” and implied that we are attacking Bitcoin because our families don’t depend on it like yours and Marty’s do.
The majority of miners did not initially support segwit without segwit 2x, you are rewriting history to fit your narrative.
Btw, what is your actual problem with a successful bip-110?
Let’s say you change your mind and lobby cleanspark and your other Wall St friends to start signaling now, the snowball effect would have most miners signal- and we get bip-110 with a smooth non-disruptive activation.
You were highly supportive of Taproot, which ending up causing most of the problems we see today- so why aren’t you in support of bip-110?
You called me and everyone else in support of bip-110 a “lynch-mob” and implied that we are attacking Bitcoin because our families don’t depend on it like yours and Marty’s do.
The majority of miners did not initially support segwit without segwit 2x, you are rewriting history to fit your narrative.
Btw, what is your actual problem with a successful bip-110?
Let’s say you change your mind and lobby cleanspark and your other Wall St friends to start signaling now, the snowball effect would have most miners signal- and we get bip-110 with a smooth non-disruptive activation.
You were highly supportive of Taproot, which ending up causing most of the problems we see today- so why aren’t you in support of bip-110?
1🤙1
node numbers are easy to fake, proof of work is not
segwit had overwhelming consensus, bip110 is not even close
your chart leaves out the most likely outcome: bip110 has barely any hash rate at acti...
What kind of alternate history do you live in?
Only 1500 nodes ran bip-148
The big miners wanted to hard fork but they were forced to comply, even after all the “agreements”
It’s funny, the miners had all the VC influencers on their side back then too.
It didn’t make a difference 😉
Only 1500 nodes ran bip-148
The big miners wanted to hard fork but they were forced to comply, even after all the “agreements”
It’s funny, the miners had all the VC influencers on their side back then too.
It didn’t make a difference 😉
1🤙1
> The only risk here is that VC wall st suits scare enough people into doing a URSF and splitting the chain.
nope, if bip110 activates with minority hash rate, which will likely be the case, then the...
I say there is enough consensus because more nodes are running the bip-110 soft fork than during segwit.
The game theory is already in motion.
Miners will obey the tighter rules or they will risk their entire business over 0.1% fee revenue from spam.
You- as a node runner unwilling to upgrade- can sit this one out 👍
Your v25/v28 core node will continue to work fine with the new consensus.
https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/bip-110-the-miners-paradox
The game theory is already in motion.
Miners will obey the tighter rules or they will risk their entire business over 0.1% fee revenue from spam.
You- as a node runner unwilling to upgrade- can sit this one out 👍
Your v25/v28 core node will continue to work fine with the new consensus.
https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/bip-110-the-miners-paradox
2🤙1
it is way too aggressive on restricting taproot, considering inscriptions will still be possible after, if the goal was actually achieving consensus then it probably should just be a cap on op return
...
Well this is a soft fork like segwit so you don’t have to update your node.
It will continue to work fine with the new consensus.
And even if the “restriction on taproot” is somehow bad- the rules will revert in 1 year.
The only risk here is that VC wall st suits scare enough people into doing a URSF and splitting the chain. Don’t be that guy.
If you are so concerned about miners then you should be shilling ocean 24/7
Anyway, there is already enough consensus already and the miner incentive is to activate smoothly mid august.
It will continue to work fine with the new consensus.
And even if the “restriction on taproot” is somehow bad- the rules will revert in 1 year.
The only risk here is that VC wall st suits scare enough people into doing a URSF and splitting the chain. Don’t be that guy.
If you are so concerned about miners then you should be shilling ocean 24/7
Anyway, there is already enough consensus already and the miner incentive is to activate smoothly mid august.
1🤙1
Remember when this lifelong liar and grifter tricked a bunch of lames on Nostr into thinking he wouldn’t be exactly who he has always been 😂😂😂😂😂
nostr:nevent1qqsvnp5xq5z0jtuv5p9dr6xcu...
Option 1.
WW3 with Ross still in prison.
Option 2.
WW3 with Ross out of prison.
gfy
WW3 with Ross still in prison.
Option 2.
WW3 with Ross out of prison.
gfy
2
Don't trust, verify.
You aren’t responding to any of Hodl’s points- you are doing as-hominem and attacking him because of “op-sec”
Usually intelligent people debate the IDEAS and not the people
Usually intelligent people debate the IDEAS and not the people
You've Been Lied to About Iran | Why We're at War and How it Affects Bitcoin 👇 https://blossom.primal.net/adf99447117e1f681557520117d41b60b2df123d9ef2097231478a47e0f297f6.mp4
Bitcoin CAN be brought into the system if people stop running their own nodes!
❤️2
ocean was fine with “vc suit odell” when they were asking for my money
if you dont see the large group of people on your side harassing anyone that has concerns over the fork then you are blind
...
Odell is it projection at this point?
I’ve have been a fan of RHR and it’s sad to see you lash out like this, especially that podcast where you said bip-110 is an attack on Bitcoin.
You said “my family depends on Bitcoin”
-as if ALL OF US don’t depend on Bitcoin?
And people like me don’t have a lot of VC IPO companies in the pipe that I can use for fiat gains just in case.
You should honestly read and analyze bip-110 and its path to successful and NON-DISRUPTIVE activation.
I’ve have been a fan of RHR and it’s sad to see you lash out like this, especially that podcast where you said bip-110 is an attack on Bitcoin.
You said “my family depends on Bitcoin”
-as if ALL OF US don’t depend on Bitcoin?
And people like me don’t have a lot of VC IPO companies in the pipe that I can use for fiat gains just in case.
You should honestly read and analyze bip-110 and its path to successful and NON-DISRUPTIVE activation.
1🤙2
The only reason anyone knows who you are is because you are bad at opsec. Now you want to give people technical advice? Retard.
Keep trusting the experts moron
❤️1😂1
i have not said it is a "nothingburger"
i have said that it is being blown out of proportion to try to rush through a reckless fork without consensus
concerns with local policy defaults is best miti...
“Yall” = a “lynch-mob” who want to destroy Bitcoin according to VC SUIT Odell.
2❤️2