Open in Damus
mcshane
@mcshane
1690997961
neuralink, what do you think?
19
1
❤️
5
🤙
3
Marcelinho
· 141w
🖕
Mabardino 🍀
· 141w
im not putting a chip in my brain unless its open source lol
nothenry
· 141w
https://i.nostrimg.com/2e56c9d762fa70a08758a7f7a18f10790f573d022db6030599db47079870f066/file.jpeg
Sergio
· 141w
Removal of free will. Hive mind. Mind control.
Amanda
· 141w
Time to build & communicate above
TA
· 141w
Put chip in brain and renovate disabled person😎
Kendy
· 141w
I’m supportive after listening to this entire episode: https://youtu.be/3ZGItIAUQmI It’s best to understand in long form before judging.
𝔹𝕦𝕔𝕜
· 141w
You’ll be charged $8 a month if you want to retain access to your regular cognitive functions. You’ll get a cool “X” on your forehead though.
AJ Nobody ⚡🏴
· 141w
Fuck. that. shit.
no₿ody™ 🧱
· 141w
Seems like a whole pandora’s box of new surveillance and control mechanisms by agencies and whatnot I would not volunteer to beta test it that’s for sure
matata
· 141w
i honestly expect that neuralink and the like are going to help more ppl into disability than it will help disabled ppl
Entropy
· 141w
I think transhumanism is a tragedy waiting to unfold. I don't have a problem with people facing extreme limitations making an informed decision about the risks, but I fear that this tech will spread into the consumer realm over time.
preston
· 141w
nostr:npub1nw5vdz8sj89y3h3tp7dunx8rhsm2qzfpf8ujq9m8mfvjsjth0uwqs9n2gn had a profound take this morning on twitter. https://twitter.com/ICOffenderII/status/1686791617984819215
Reed Nakamoto
· 141w
No way in hell
Hazey
· 141w
Absolutely, BUT only if it is fully open source and can be self-hosted.