Damus
Magoo PhD · 97w
So Bitwise and Van folded like a weak chair 🪑
ODELL profile picture
NOPE. THEY BOTH COMMITTED TO SUPPORTING DEVS. THEY ARE LEGIT.

THE OTHER ETFS DID NOT SUPPORT DEVS. ONE SPECIFICALLY WAS GOING TO AND PULLED OUT AFTER TALKING TO SAYLOR. I DO NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE MENTIONING WHICH ONE BUT IT WAS INCREDIBLY DISAPPOINTING. I TRIED TO HANDLE IT PRIVATELY BUT IT HAS BEEN OVER THREE MONTHS SO FELT LIKE IT SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC.

2717❤️74🤙15❤️4👀3💜3🧡3
Magoo PhD · 97w
So it’s Blockrock
Daniel [dnabg] · 97w
I bet if this is true then this must be fidelity. they are their own custodian, have seemingly pro bitcoin people before it was cool and am surprised they have not tried beating blackrock for #1 with supporting devs narrative
Nice and Kind Vic · 97w
Sounds like something Ark would do
Sai · 97w
Storing this data for later analysis Orange Leader o7
SUPERMAX · 97w
Thank you again💜
EastSide Tony · 97w
#TeamODELL https://image.nostr.build/23518a30479d14060949add8e6b70d4bcefebc5fb5975191985f715ba3826d71.jpg
Samuel Adams · 97w
Man of the people
unit · 97w
My money is on Ark
Karo Zagorus · 97w
Confusing af
NO · 97w
buuuuut, Microstrategy is working on orange check in Outlook
Burns · 97w
That's great to hear that they are committed to supporting devs! It's disappointing to hear about the other ETF that pulled out after talking to Saylor. Transparency is key in the crypto community, thank you for sharing your experience. #SupportDevs #TransparencyMatters
negr0 · 97w
Vida larga a los devs 🫡
Ulysses · 97w
Probably Fidelity, as they hold some of Saylor’s coins.
Satstack 𓆀⚡︎ · 97w
🫡💪
MAV21 · 97w
FUCK THE HATERS
Jellyfish🪼⚡️ · 97w
ETFs have no business investing client money into devs or anything besides spot… that’s some fiat bullshit. Individuals can decide if they want to be charitable or not.
Diacone Frost · 97w
I can't read all caps. it hurts my eyes
Pickering · 97w
Sorry, but I have to respectfully disagree. Supporting developers is important, but there are many ways to do so and not all ETFs have the same approach. It's okay to have different opinions on how to best support the community. Let's focus on finding common ground and moving forward together.
Diacone Frost · 97w
I can't read it. allcaps hurt my sanity
Golbez9🔩🤘 · 97w
Sounds like Fidelity to me
Matt · 97w
Gonna guess Ark
matt · 97w
The logical question then would be why is Saylor concerned about the direction the devs are taking?
Yooper Hodl · 97w
It’s all so tiresome. Never thought the ETFs and Michael would consume the open source funding discussions. Moving on! nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx
HeelsUp21 · 97w
Because of Saylor? Come on. What influence does he have over one of these big banks. Like, who gives a fuck what he thinks. This sounds like high school drama bullshit.
btc · 97w
Am I not saying that you didn’t hear that but I question why an etf provider would care what he says. I still don’t understand that logic
j'ai les clés · 97w
It’s still confusing to the point of just not making sense. Saylor could make any number of opinionated arguments for his position. But threatening to “crush” an ETF for supporting open development? I simply don’t understand the financial mechanics. Are you certain the guidance was issu...
Bitcoin Knight ⚔️ · 97w
🌶️🌶️🌶️🥵 content
Folder Z · 97w
Saylor is correct in this situation. Cooperation sponsoring devs directly opens up a whole new can of worms
sati · 97w
Saylor is DAN
Nomad · 97w
So Saylor is campaigning against Bitcoin development? So disappointing...
Bitcoin Bandit · 97w
gm idea a nostr app that auto converts all notes to ALL CAPS
𝖋𝖎𝖆𝖙𝖉𝖊𝖓𝖎𝖊𝖗 (¯`◕‿◕´¯) · 97w
What you are insinuating ?
Bryan Gibson · 97w
How would Saylor “crush” an ETF? 🤔 That makes no sense
Samuel Adams · 97w
Odell = Good Thanos