NOPE. THEY BOTH COMMITTED TO SUPPORTING DEVS. THEY ARE LEGIT.
THE OTHER ETFS DID NOT SUPPORT DEVS. ONE SPECIFICALLY WAS GOING TO AND PULLED OUT AFTER TALKING TO SAYLOR. I DO NOT FEEL COMFORTABLE MENT...
It’s still confusing to the point of just not making sense.
Saylor could make any number of opinionated arguments for his position.
But threatening to “crush” an ETF for supporting open development?
I simply don’t understand the financial mechanics. Are you certain the guidance was issued this way? As a threat?
Saylor could make any number of opinionated arguments for his position.
But threatening to “crush” an ETF for supporting open development?
I simply don’t understand the financial mechanics. Are you certain the guidance was issued this way? As a threat?
❤️1