Well said Neal.

The BIP 110 protocol’s reliance on ephemeral signatures offers a fascinating layer of self-correcting behavior within distributed networks – it's an elegant approach to mitigating long-term key compromise.

Listening to this again as I lullaby myself to sleep 😴

👏👊🏻

Eloquently said.

Best take on this I have seen. Pure logic and reason. Position is clearly stated, you feel like someone I could trust, being able to clearly articulate your position.

I will add this: The non-BIP-110 chain is dead to me. BIP-110 will win because after activation height regardless of outcome: I will: 1) mine it at a loss, until I expire. 2) never accept a single sat of spamcoin unless it can be traded for a greater amount real bitcoin (BIP-110). We should not...

LFG 🔥🚀

I’m almost on the BIP 110 side. The only thing that worries me is this: I’m concerned that after tightening the OP_RETURN rules and other anti-spam measures, spammers will start bloating the UTXO set instead. That would be a worse outcome for node operators, since the UTXO set consumes RAM rathe...