Damus
Raison d'Γ‰tat · 3w
The goclimate puff piece is not a credible source, farmland cannot be costlessly converted from pasture to legumes. Ourworldindata is more credible, but now you have moved the goalposts, and are now...
Mr. Cliff, B.Sc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦πŸ‡±πŸ‡§ profile picture
@Raison d'Γ‰tat @Alex Gleason @John

>Each of my points still stands.

No, each of your points stands on the basis of your own assertion alone, against a report that cites reliable sources to back its claims which you decry as a 'puff piece'. I've done *some* reading on this and have encountered more reports like it but they all agree with them, not you. ie you made the claim, now both that goclimate is wrong and that per hectare the tilt is against veganism: the burden of proof is on you to justify this and you have not done so. Though of course really the burden is on @John
1
Raison d'Γ‰tat · 3w
No, your sources are puff pieces with more "spherical cows" than an undergrad physics paper. You are at liberty to use Google Scholar to DYOR for reals. All readers should, but beware of special pleading - veganism is not a disclosable interest for authors, but it probably should be.