@Raison d'Γtat @Alex Gleason @John >Each of my points still stands.
No, each of your points stands on the basis of your own assertion alone, against a report that cites reliable sources to back its claims which you decry as a 'puff piece'. I've done *some* reading on this and have encountered more reports like it but they all agree with them, not you. ie you made the claim, now both that goclimate is wrong and that per hectare the tilt is against veganism: the burden of proof is on you to justify this and you have not done so. Though of course really the burden is on
@John